# A Carleman Function and the Cauchy Problem for the Laplace by Yarmukhamedov Sh.

By Yarmukhamedov Sh.

Similar mathematics books

MEI AS Pure Mathematics (3rd Edition)

The highly-acclaimed MEI sequence of textual content books, helping OCR's MEI dependent arithmetic specification, absolutely fit the necessities of the requisites, and are reknowned for his or her scholar pleasant method.

Mathematical methods for physicists

An entire consultant to the mathematical instruments and strategies used to unravel difficulties in physics, with a brand new paintings application, and references for utilizing Numerical Recipes and Mathematica.

Extra info for A Carleman Function and the Cauchy Problem for the Laplace Equation

Example text

The following gives a bounded slope condition having this eﬀect; we return to the generic notation. 4 Theorem Let X be an open subset of Rm . Suppose that there exist positive constants c, d such that x ∈ X, v ∈ Γ(x), (α, β) ∈ NGP (x, v) =⇒ |α| ≤ {c |v| + d} |β| . 5. PROXIMAL CRITERIA FOR PSEUDO-LIPSCHITZNESS 55 Let any x∗ ∈ X and v∗ ∈ Γ(x∗ ) be given, together with ε > 0 such that B(x∗ , ε) ⊂ X. Set 1 . δ∗ := min ε, 3(1 + 2c) Then for any N ≥ 1, the multifunction Γ is pseudo-Lipschitz of radius RN := (c |v∗ | + d)N near (x∗ , v∗ ) as follows: for any x, x ∈ B(x∗ , δ∗ ) we have Γ(x ) ∩ B(v∗ , RN ) ⊂ Γ(x) + kN x − x B, where kN := (c |v∗ | + d)(1 + 2cN ).

3) with the following data: f (x, v) := IG (x, v), Y := {x2 } × B(v1 , k |x2 − x1 |). We take the base point (x1 , v1 ), and a tolerance ε˜ small enough in a sense to be speciﬁed presently. If G ∩ Y is nonempty, the existence of the required point v2 follows. Therefore we suppose that G ∩ Y is empty, and we proceed to get a contradiction. Since (under the emptiness assumption) minY f = +∞, the Mean Value Inequality asserts that for any r > 0 we may write r < ζ, x2 − x1 + ψ, v − v1 + ε˜ for all v ∈ B(v1 , k |x2 − x1 |), where (ζ, ψ) belongs to ∂P f (z, w), and where (z, w) is a point within distance ε˜ of the set co [Y ∪ {(x1 , v1 )}].

2 36 CHAPTER 2. 18) (via the second term in the minimum). There remains Case 3. From |fi (t)| = (1 − λi (t)η)RN (t) we derive |λi (t)fi (t)| ≥ (λ0 − η)RN (t). With this in mind we put λ = 1 and f ∈ F (t, xi (t)) ∩ B(0, r0 ) in the Weierstrass condition and deduce pi (t), λi (t)fi (t) − f + εi (1 + 4N 2 ) ≥ φ((λ0 − η)RN (t)). 8). End of the proof We now complete the proof of the theorem. We showed above that there exist p and γ (not both 0) satisfying the transversality and Euler conditions, and the Weierstrass condition of radius (λ0 − 2η)RN (t).