By John Dinsmore
This paintings offers a procedural account of the so-called ‘projection challenge’ for presupposition. it's assumed that presuppositions embedded in complicated sentences are topic to no projection principles or ad-hoc stipulations no matter what, yet are in reality happy in acceptable contexts in a totally uniform manner. it really is validated that the plain filtering, alteration, or renovation of an embedded presupposition is in each case a logical final result of a basic, independently influenced version of language processing and data illustration. it really is proven intimately that turning the ‘projection challenge’ upside-down during this means ends up in a much more explanatory and descriptively enough account than any formerly proposed.
Read or Download The Inheritance of Presupposition PDF
Best semantics books
This booklet makes an attempt to marry truth-conditional semantics with cognitive linguistics within the church of computational neuroscience. To this finish, it examines the truth-conditional meanings of coordinators, quantifiers, and collective predicates as neurophysiological phenomena which are amenable to a neurocomputational research.
The LNCS magazine on info Semantics is dedicated to the presentation of amazing paintings that, in a single approach or one other, addresses learn and improvement on matters with regards to info semantics. The scope of the magazine levels from theories assisting the formal definition of semantic content material to cutting edge domain-specific functions of semantic wisdom.
An figuring out of genres in verbal exchange (written and spoken) is vital to expert good fortune. This quantity experiences situationally acceptable responses in expert verbal exchange in face-to-face interplay and distance communique, from a socio-cognitive standpoint. a standard rhetorical process doesn't supply a lot perception within the ways that genres are embedded in communicative job or how actors draw upon style wisdom to accomplish successfully.
Metasemantics includes new paintings at the philosophical foundations of linguistic semantics, via a various team of validated and rising specialists within the philosophy of language, metaphysics, and the speculation of content material. The technological know-how of semantics aspires to systematically specify the meanings of linguistic expressions in context.
- Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory)
- Analysing the Language of Discourse Communities, 1st Edition
- Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language (Explorations in Language and Space)
- Impassioned Belief
- The Nature of Truth: An updated approach to the meaning of truth ascriptions (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science)
Extra resources for The Inheritance of Presupposition
C)) with respect to the world it identifies, it is assimilated in a way analogous to communicated information. For in stance, let (27) (a) be uttered in c0 such that (b) occurs in 38 PRESUPPOSITION (27) (a) If the King of France is bald and George is a paratrouper, then the King of France doesn't wear army boots after all. and George is a paratrouper, then the King of France doesn't wear army boots after all. In this utterance (27) (c) The King of France is bald and George is a paratrouper. serves as an antecedent to identify some world w.
Therefore the presupposition is predicted for (60) in exaxtly the same way as for (56). To account for sentences like (59) and (60), Karttunen and Peters' rules would have to be extended to additional lexical items and syn tactic structures on a case-by-case basis, while the correct predic tions are an immediate consequence of the present account. The following is such a sentence: (61) (a) George used to smoke and he has stopped smoking. (61) (a) contains the PC 'stop' associated with the EP (61) (b) George used to smoke.
C) Either there is a King of France, or... (d) There is a King of France. ' is uttered between C0 and c, we can regard C ( C Q , c, w) for any w as a tautology, since this will be practically the only common entail ment or implicature of most sentences beginning this way. The information communicated by an utterance up to a given point is assumed to affect the given information for the utterance in the following way. (G2) For any c0, Î , where is temporally ordered after C 0 , any w Î W, C(Cg, c, w) Î G(c, w ) .